A right of first refusal grants a specific third party the option to purchase a property on the same terms another buyer has offered, before the seller can complete a sale with that other buyer. This provision, when it exists, introduces a procedural step many sellers do not anticipate until they encounter it directly.
How This Right Typically Comes Into Existence
This right most commonly arises through a previous agreement, sometimes contained within a lease the current owner granted to a tenant, occasionally established through a prior sale agreement with a family member or business partner, or through a formal recorded document specifically establishing this right in favor of a named party.
A seller should review their property’s history and any existing agreements carefully before marketing the property, since a right of first refusal held by someone unaware they possess it can still create genuine complications once discovered, regardless of whether the seller remembered its existence.
What Happens Once a Sale Agreement Is Reached
When a right of first refusal exists and a seller reaches agreement with a different buyer, the seller typically must first notify the rights holder of the proposed terms, providing them a specified window, often thirty days though this varies by the specific agreement, to decide whether to purchase the property themselves under those same terms.
This notification requirement applies regardless of how enthusiastic the seller may be about the buyer they have already identified, since the rights holder’s option must be honored before the seller can proceed with any other purchaser, potentially delaying the transaction considerably while this notification period runs its course.
What Happens If the Rights Holder Exercises Their Option
Should the rights holder choose to exercise their right of first refusal, the seller must generally complete the sale with that party under the previously agreed terms, effectively displacing the buyer the seller had originally selected, regardless of that buyer’s readiness or enthusiasm to proceed.
This outcome can create genuine complications with the originally selected buyer, who may have already begun their own preparations for the purchase, making clear communication about this possibility important from the earliest stages of any transaction where this right might apply.
What Happens If the Rights Holder Declines
If the rights holder does not exercise their option within the specified window, the seller generally becomes free to proceed with the original buyer under the previously negotiated terms, though some agreements specify that materially different terms offered to a subsequent buyer might restart this notification requirement.
Why This Provision Sometimes Gets Overlooked
A right of first refusal established years earlier, perhaps through a family arrangement or a lease provision from a tenant who has since moved out, sometimes fades from a seller’s memory entirely, only to resurface unexpectedly once a title search or careful review of prior agreements brings it back to light during an active transaction.
How This Interacts With Verbal Understandings
A verbal agreement cannot typically override a properly documented right of first refusal, meaning even an informal understanding that a particular right no longer applies generally requires formal documentation releasing that right before a seller can safely proceed without risk of the rights holder later asserting their still-valid contractual option.
Identifying and Addressing This Risk Before Marketing a Property
A seller uncertain whether any right of first refusal might apply to their property benefits from reviewing all prior agreements, lease documents, and recorded instruments affecting the property before beginning any marketing effort, ideally with attorney assistance ensuring nothing relevant gets overlooked before a buyer is identified and a transaction begins moving toward completion.
Leave a Reply