An assignment of contract allows a buyer to transfer their rights and obligations under a purchase agreement to a different party before closing actually occurs, a practice common in certain segments of real estate investing that a seller should understand clearly before agreeing to include this provision in their own transaction.
What This Arrangement Actually Involves
A buyer requesting the right to assign their contract is essentially asking for permission to transfer the agreement to a different purchaser, sometimes an entity they have not yet identified at the time of signing, effectively allowing that different party to complete the actual purchase in the original buyer’s place once the assignment occurs.
This arrangement is common in certain wholesale real estate investing strategies, where an investor secures a purchase agreement with the specific intention of assigning it to another investor for a fee, rather than personally completing the purchase and closing on the property themselves.
Why Sellers Sometimes Encounter This Request
A seller working with a buyer, particularly one representing themselves as a cash investor, sometimes finds an assignment clause included in the proposed purchase agreement, either prominently disclosed or, less desirably, included within dense contract language a seller might not immediately notice or fully understand without careful, attentive review.
Understanding whether your specific agreement includes this provision, and what it would actually mean in practice should the buyer exercise it, matters considerably before signing, since this clause can meaningfully affect who ultimately shows up at closing to actually complete the transaction with you.
What This Means for You as the Seller
An assignment does not necessarily harm a seller’s interests directly, provided the eventual assignee genuinely has the funds and legitimate intention to close as originally agreed under the same essential terms. The seller still receives the agreed purchase price at closing regardless of which specific party ultimately completes the transaction under the assigned agreement.
The genuine risk lies in the original buyer assigning to a party who cannot actually complete the purchase, whether due to inadequate funds or simple bad faith, potentially leaving the seller having taken their property off the market for an extended period only to have the transaction ultimately fail to close as originally anticipated.
Questions Worth Asking Before Agreeing to This Provision
Asking directly whether the buyer intends to assign the contract, and if so, to whom and under what specific circumstances, provides important context before agreeing to include this provision in your agreement, rather than discovering the buyer’s actual intentions only after the fact once an assignment has already occurred.
Requesting that any assignment require your written consent, rather than allowing unrestricted assignment without any seller input or approval, provides meaningful additional protection, allowing you to at least evaluate and approve the eventual assignee before the transaction proceeds forward with a potentially unfamiliar new party.
How Assignment Fees Typically Work
The original buyer arranging an assignment typically collects a fee from the eventual assignee for transferring their contractual rights, a fee entirely separate from and unrelated to the purchase price you receive as the seller, meaning this arrangement generally does not affect your own proceeds directly regardless of how it might work financially between the two other parties involved.
Protecting Yourself If You Permit This Provision
Verifying the eventual assignee’s proof of funds independently, exactly as you would with any other buyer, protects your interests regardless of how the assignee came to be involved in your specific transaction, ensuring whoever ultimately completes the purchase genuinely has the financial capacity to actually close as agreed.
How This Connects to Other Payment-Related Risks
Understanding the risk of accepting a personal check represents a related category of risk worth understanding alongside assignment provisions, since both situations ultimately come down to the same underlying principle, verifying that whoever you are actually transacting with, whatever route brought them to your specific closing table, genuinely has the legitimate capacity and intention to complete the transaction exactly as agreed.
Deciding Whether to Permit This Provision
A seller uncomfortable with the uncertainty an assignment clause introduces retains the right to decline including this provision entirely, requiring the original buyer to personally complete the purchase rather than transferring that obligation to an unknown future party you would have no opportunity to independently evaluate before closing.
Leave a Reply